3Īt the same time, these same technologies and other means have been increasingly used to surveil and suppress such movements.Ī peaceful assembly, including the right to protest, 4 2ĭigital technologies have to a certain degree enabled and facilitated these movements as they have been used to coordinate conversations, raise awareness, encourage participation and generate support. In 2019 alone, there were more than 100 protests in numerous countries around the globe. The ability to assemble, dissent and protest peacefully is a key element in every society, democratic or otherwise. The views expressed in this article reflect those of the author. * Many thanks to Valentina Cadelo and Tomaso Falchetta for their input on the latest version of this article. This is necessary not only to preserve the distinct nature of freedom of assembly that protects collective action, but also to allow for better regulation of surveillance and interference with internet communications during assemblies. These measures are primarily analyzed as interferences with the right to privacy and freedom of expression, but it is argued here that protest and other assembly surveillance should also be understood as an infringement of freedom of assembly. Arguing that they do so in order to protect assemblies, governments deploy a wide array of measures, including facial recognition, fake mobile towers and internet shutdowns. Every day across the world, as people assemble, demonstrate and protest, their pictures, their messages, tweets and other personal information are amassed without adequate justification.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |